BY
now, much of the moviegoing world is familiar with “The Monuments Men,”
an art-historical film that sees George Clooney, Matt Damon and other
stars swashbuckling around Europe during World War II,
trying to save masterpieces like the Ghent Altarpiece and a Rembrandt
self-portrait from bombs and the clutches of German and Russian troops.
As the film opens, Mr. Clooney’s character is seen addressing President
Roosevelt, trying to persuade him to help safeguard Europe’s cultural
patrimony.
“While
we must and will win this war,” he intones, “we should also remember
the higher price that will be paid if the very foundation of modern
society is looted or destroyed.” Near the end, having discovered
Michelangelo’s Madonna of Bruges hidden by the Nazis in Austria’s
Altaussee salt mine, he cocks his head at her jauntily and says, “Let’s
get out of here.”
Mr.
Clooney’s debonair, mustachioed role was inspired by the real-life
exploits of George L. Stout, the American conservator who dreamed up the
idea of sending art experts to war to protect Europe’s cultural
treasures, as Robert M. Edsel recounts in the 2009 book on which the
film was based. As depicted in the movie, Mr. Stout traveled to the
front as part of the Monuments, Fine Arts and Archives Section of the
Allied military effort, a detachment of eight men who tried to safeguard
and repatriate monuments and artworks under fire. But like so many
other veterans of the war effort, Mr. Stout rarely tooted his own horn
about his wartime feats.
In
fact, his posthumous outing as a boots-on-the-ground war hero seems to
have taken many conservators by surprise. In their world, Mr. Stout, who
died in 1978, is already revered, but for a very different achievement:
being a pioneer and promoter of the scientifically grounded
conservation methods that define the field today.
In
1928, together with the chemist Rutherford J. Gettens, Mr. Stout
established America’s first conservation research laboratory at Harvard
University’s Fogg Museum, under the leadership of the museum’s director,
Edward W. Forbes.
After
the war, Mr. Stout became the founding president of the field’s first
international professional association, now called the International
Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (known in the
field as the I.I.C.), established in 1950 to foster scientific training
and help members share expertise across national borders.
He
also produced seminal publications and textbooks, served as director of
two major museums, helped establish America’s first graduate
conservation program (at New York University’s Institute of Fine Arts in
1960) and generally led a vast range of efforts to modernize and
professionalize the way art was restored and preserved.
Without
Mr. Stout, said Jerry Podany, the senior conservator of antiquities at
the J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles, and the I.I.C.’s president
emeritus, conservation might have remained a matter of “dark magic,”
practiced by “a scattered group of restorers who worked with traditional
recipes that didn’t have a good solid material science base.” Imagining
the profession without Mr. Stout’s input, Mr. Podany added, “is like
asking where doctors would be if they hadn’t started looking at biology
and anatomy.”
Sarah
Staniforth, the current I.I.C. president, who oversees historic
properties for Britain’s National Trust, credits Mr. Stout with “setting
up conservation departments and laboratories and training a whole
generation of conservators in the United States.”
Born
in 1897 in Iowa, Mr. Stout enjoyed drawing as a boy, but his real
involvement with art began only after World War I. Having served with
the Army in a field hospital near Munich, he said in a 1978 interview
conducted by the Smithsonian’s Archives of American Art, he returned
home in 1919 and decided to study drawing and painting at the University
of Iowa. After graduation, he taught drawing there for three years. But
by 1926, he was at Harvard, pursuing a master’s in art history and
working part time as a researcher in the university’s art museum, the
Fogg. He was named director of the laboratory when it was created in
1928. At the time, conservation was typically a matter of artisanal
spiffing up — cannily retouching paint that had peeled or eroded,
carving a new arm for a broken marble sculpture, or trying to stop a
wood panel from buckling by gluing heavy wood battens to the back (often
without worrying if what was being done would cause new problems, or if
the process could be reversed).
The
Fogg’s director, Mr. Forbes, was intent on promoting a more solid
scientific grounding. By the time Mr. Stout arrived, the museum had
already embarked upon a broad and systematic X-ray study of paintings,
the better to understand their materials and compositional techniques.
When Mr. Forbes urged him to work with a chemist, Mr. Stout hired
another graduate student, Mr. Gettens. Soon after receiving their
degrees, the two became an indefatigable — and effective — double act.
At
first, Mr. Stout said in the 1978 Smithsonian interview, “we were
interested primarily in materials, pigments, mediums and whatever went
into the construction of a painting.” They analyzed pigment and varnish
samples, with an eye to developing more durable artists’ materials. They
designed a hypodermic needle, the microsectioner, that allowed them to
extract microscopic samples from specific paintings, the better to
understand how they were structured. Mr. Stout set about codifying the
language used by conservators in condition reports. And together, the
two pioneered the use of polymerized vinyl acetate (the transparent
resin used in white glue), which for a time seemed a miracle solution to
the problem of flaking paint.
But
“what really put the Fogg on the map,” said Francesca G. Bewer, a
research curator at the Harvard Art Museums who is the leading authority
on the conservation department’s history, was when Mr. Stout and Mr.
Gettens pieced together and stabilized some celebrated early Buddhist
mud wall paintings that had been acquired in pieces by institutions like
the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and the Royal Ontario Museum. And
because they “felt accountable toward future generations,” Dr. Bewer
added, they scrupulously documented what they’d done, becoming a driving
force for improving documentation in other museums. (As America was
entering the war, Mr. Stout also pulled together best practices for
protecting and storing art, and he circulated the information to museums
and the public — know-how that came in handy later when he was rescuing
objects at the front.)
“Every
problem that came to us was an adventure,” Mr. Stout said in another
1978 interview, this one for Museum News. (Nonetheless, as he also
noted, this pragmatic approach didn’t always go over well. To some, he
noted, “it was vulgar to talk about material and condition. That was as
naughty as to inquire about the digestive system of an opera singer.”)
The
Fogg was not the only museum in the world with a scientific research
lab. The first was established in 1888 at the Royal Museums of Berlin,
the second in 1920 by the British Museum, after its curators realized
how badly their iron and bronze antiquities had decayed during World War
I, when they had been stored in the humid tunnels of the London
underground.
What
set the Fogg apart was that it was a teaching institution. Its
experiments ranged beyond its own holdings. And, to disseminate
knowledge, Mr. Stout founded the first conservation journal, Technical
Studies in the Field of the Fine Arts, which was published quarterly
from 1932 to 1942, with him as editor. Mr. Gettens and Mr. Stout went on
to publish some of their findings in the manual “Painting Materials: A
Short Encyclopedia” in 1942. Even today “it remains a key source for our
field,” said Joyce Hill Stoner, who teaches at the Winterthur Museum in
Wilmington, Del., and also directs the preservation studies doctoral
program at the University of Delaware in Newark. “There is nothing that
has yet supplanted it,” Dr. Stoner added. “That’s extremely amazing to
say about something from 1942.”
Mr.
Stout was eager to promote international cooperation. He had
represented America at the first world conservation conference, held by
the International Museums Office of the League of Nations in Rome in
1930, and had strong contacts in Europe when the aerial bombardment and
looting of its masterworks began. After the war, in an effort to keep
communication flowing, he advocated creating an international body that
could carry on the work of the Monuments Men in peacetime, which
resulted in the 1950 foundation of the I.I.C. (Although the first
meeting that led to this was at the Fogg, the new organization was
instead based in London, on the theory that a midpoint between America
and Continental Europe would prompt more participation.)
Meanwhile,
back in America, Mr. Stout was setting up more conservation labs; the
first at the Worcester Art Museum in Massachusetts, where he was named
director in 1947, and the second at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum
in Boston, which he directed from 1955 until his retirement in 1970.
In
1975, he needled Dr. Stoner, then a young conservator herself, into
establishing another important resource — the oral history archive that
she now oversees for the Foundation of the American Institute for
Conservation, a national association formed in 1973. Now composed of
nearly 300 interviews, as well as conservators’ papers, it provides a
useful adjunct to postgraduate work, with former students volunteering
to interview their elders. “It’s one of the great ways to get young
people grounded in the history of our field,” Dr. Stoner said. (The
program draws interviewers from Europe, as well as America’s four
graduate conservation programs, at New York University; the University
of Delaware with the Winterthur Museum; the University of California,
Los Angeles; and Buffalo State College, part of the State University of
New York.)
In
fact, Dr. Stoner said, generating major ideas, planning them precisely
and encouraging other people to carry them out was Mr. Stout’s typical
modus operandi. “He wasn’t someone who was up on a scaffolding saving
great works of art,” she said. “He was a think tank. He looked at the
big picture, internationally. He saw what publications were needed, what
sort of conferences should be held. Then, in his quiet way, he would
cause it to happen.”
And
“while he would of course parry any depiction of himself as a hero,”
Dr. Stoner added, “he would also get a good chuckle out of George
Clooney playing him.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário